Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Hady Habib Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 May at 06:26 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Manuel Cerundolo vs H. Habib

ARG
2
Win
Played
0
Win

LIB
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cerundolo 2 - 0 Habib
They have played 5 sets in total, with Juan Manuel Cerundolo winning 4 and Hady Habib winning 1. The last match between Juan Manuel Cerundolo and Hady Habib was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Clay, with Juan Manuel Cerundolo getting the victory 6-4 6-7(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cerundolo | 2 |
| Habib | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q2) French Open - Paris(05-22-25)
(SF) Santa Cruz de la Sierra 2 Challenger(06-21-24)
J. M. Cerundolo vs H. Habib H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $684,585 | Career Prize Money | $284,500 |
| 61.76% (294-182) | Career Total W/L | 62.69% (326-194) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 11 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 47.06% (8-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 16.67% (1-5) |
J. M. Cerundolo vs H. Habib Match Preview:
- In recent months, Habib has slightly outperformed Cerundolo on second serve points, winning 48.15% compared to Cerundolo's 47.53%. Could this indicate an edge in serving stability for Habib?
- Cerundolo has demonstrated superior return stats, winning 46.83% and 28.46% of opponent's second and first serve points, respectively, compared to Habib's 43.33% and 20.06%. This suggests Cerundolo might have an advantage in breaking serve.
- Under pressure, Habib has a better breakpoint save rate, rescuing 64.94% versus Cerundolo's 55.14%. Is Habib more resilient in critical moments?
- Over the past year, Cerundolo boasts a higher overall match win rate of 66.27%, overshadowing Habib's 57.35%. This suggests Cerundolo is generally more successful in recent competition.
- Surface preferences may play a role: Habib excels on Hard courts with a 68% win rate, while Cerundolo is strongest on Clay with a 64% win rate.
- In head-to-head encounters, Cerundolo has a perfect record against Habib, winning their only match and both sets. Could historical success indicate a psychological edge for Cerundolo?
- Cerundolo's matches have generally involved higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 217.58 against Habib's 265.65. Does this mean Cerundolo is more accustomed to challenging competition?
- Despite Habib winning 67% of deciding sets over the last year compared to Cerundolo's 65%, neither has played a deciding set against the other.
- Break point conversion rates heavily favor Cerundolo, who has converted 40.41% of opportunities, much higher than Habib's 21.74%.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
As their upcoming match approaches, the data offers compelling insights into both players' current forms and past performances. While Habib has shown marginally better performance on their second serve and the ability to save breakpoints effectively, Cerundolo excels in critical areas such as return games and break point conversion efficiency.
Additionally, Cerundolo's superior win rate over the past year, coupled with his success in their head-to-head matchup, further suggests a competitive edge. With experience against higher-ranked opponents and a strong track record on clay courts, Cerundolo might have better adaptation and resilience in challenging scenarios.
Given these considerations, Cerundolo appears more equipped to claim victory in the forthcoming match, leveraging his return strength and strategic advantage on preferred surfaces.
Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Hady Habib Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. M. Cerundolo vs H. Habib H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 31 | Games Won | 24 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:59:24 | Average Match Time | 1:59:24 |
| 63% (112/177) | 1st Serve % | 63% (107/169) |
| 71% (80/112) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (73/107) |
| 52% (34/65) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (28/62) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
| 40% (68/169) | Return Points Win % | 36% (63/177) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. M. Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
H. Habib Recent Matches Played

J. M. Cerundolo vs H. Habib Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.76% (294/182) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.69% (326/194) |
| 59.00% (652/453) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.82% (719/483) |
| 52.76% (5372/4809) | Games Win/Loss | 53.49% (6237/5424) |
| 43.59% (17/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.55% (193/97) |
| 64.72% (277/151) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.90% (115/77) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.57% (17/18) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.57 |
| 793 | Aces Total | 3263 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1071 | Total Double Faults | 1477 |
| 1:40:5 | Average Match Time | 1:19:22 |
| 328.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 431.65 |
| 66% (20831/31372) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18214/29669) |
| 63% (13176/20831) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (13252/18214) |
| 50% (5260/10540) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5899/11455) |
| 47% (1651/3546) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1065/2698) |
| 43% (13736/31938) | Return Points Win % | 37% (11197/29899) |
| 44.00% (11/14) | Slam W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 55.56% (10/8) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 52.94% (9/8) |
| 52.00% (39/36) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 65.31% (160/85) | Challenger W/L | 51.11% (69/66) |
| 65.49% (74/39) | Futures W/L | 68.95% (242/109) |
| 64% (287/450) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (316/507) |
| 21% (4/19) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 67% (80/120) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (117/200) |
| 61% (83/137) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (91/162) |
| 88% (283/248) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (314/282) |
| 12% (283/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (314/32) |
| 23% (193/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (206/44) |